The article was promoted by Ian Rose 10:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
X-Cops (The X-Files) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
This is The X-Files meets COPS episode of the series, and its particularly well-loved by the fanbase. I feel that this episode able to both balance the humor and scariness, both of which were facets that The X-Files was famous for. I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the FA criteria. The references have been combed through to meet MoS, the prose is good and has been looked over, and the sections are in-depth. A year ago, it passed GA review, and just recently, it was pretty heavily critiqued, reviewed, and copy-edited by Sarastro1. Any comments would probably inevitably make this article better, but I feel it is ready.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC) reply
I haven't looked further than "Conception and writing". My feeling is that this has legs as a nom, but needs some close auditing for tiddleys, preferably by someone who's fresh to it. Tony (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Concerns are minor. This article has improved quite a bit since I reviewed it for GA. Glimmer721 talk 19:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC) reply
Saw your message on Glimmer's talkpage and thought I'd add my two cents here. Overall a well-written, well-researched article; have only found a few nitpicks:
Assuming good faith on the book sources. In short, I see no issues with copyvio. Regards, Ruby 2010/ 2013 04:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC) reply
Image check - mostly all OK (fair-use, CC 2.0). Sources and authors provided. Just one issue:
Comments –
Source review
The article was promoted by Ian Rose 10:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
X-Cops (The X-Files) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
This is The X-Files meets COPS episode of the series, and its particularly well-loved by the fanbase. I feel that this episode able to both balance the humor and scariness, both of which were facets that The X-Files was famous for. I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the FA criteria. The references have been combed through to meet MoS, the prose is good and has been looked over, and the sections are in-depth. A year ago, it passed GA review, and just recently, it was pretty heavily critiqued, reviewed, and copy-edited by Sarastro1. Any comments would probably inevitably make this article better, but I feel it is ready.-- Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC) reply
I haven't looked further than "Conception and writing". My feeling is that this has legs as a nom, but needs some close auditing for tiddleys, preferably by someone who's fresh to it. Tony (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC) reply
Concerns are minor. This article has improved quite a bit since I reviewed it for GA. Glimmer721 talk 19:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC) reply
Saw your message on Glimmer's talkpage and thought I'd add my two cents here. Overall a well-written, well-researched article; have only found a few nitpicks:
Assuming good faith on the book sources. In short, I see no issues with copyvio. Regards, Ruby 2010/ 2013 04:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC) reply
Image check - mostly all OK (fair-use, CC 2.0). Sources and authors provided. Just one issue:
Comments –
Source review