The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 12:59, 13 January 2016 [1].
I believe the article, World War II, meets FA criteria. It is well written, full and vital, as well as there being plenty of images. The semiprotection of the article further bolsters its neutrality and stability. Loads of citations as well, 391 of them. CatcherStorm talk 05:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Oppose, suggest speedy closure While good faith, this hasn't been discussed on the article's talk page and the nominator doesn't have a significant history of involvement in the article. As a regular editor/commenter on the article I agree that it's in fairly good shape and could be brought to A-class standard with some work, but it's not of FA quality at present. Nick-D ( talk) 07:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 12:59, 13 January 2016 [1].
I believe the article, World War II, meets FA criteria. It is well written, full and vital, as well as there being plenty of images. The semiprotection of the article further bolsters its neutrality and stability. Loads of citations as well, 391 of them. CatcherStorm talk 05:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Oppose, suggest speedy closure While good faith, this hasn't been discussed on the article's talk page and the nominator doesn't have a significant history of involvement in the article. As a regular editor/commenter on the article I agree that it's in fairly good shape and could be brought to A-class standard with some work, but it's not of FA quality at present. Nick-D ( talk) 07:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC) reply