Object for now I was working on this article a few weeks ago when it was the United States Collaboration of the Week. Although content wise, it is FA material, much of the material still needs to be referenced. I was going to work on it more when I have some time, but I just haven't had the time lately. I would like to see it referenced more thoroughly, because it is so close to FA status. However, I cannot support it until proper referencing is done.
PDXblazers02:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Object per the concerns about the referencing, and I also think that the history section is a bit too long (Does the relocation of the Expos need to be here?) seeing as it has it's own main article.
The Halo (
talk)
01:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Object for now I was working on this article a few weeks ago when it was the United States Collaboration of the Week. Although content wise, it is FA material, much of the material still needs to be referenced. I was going to work on it more when I have some time, but I just haven't had the time lately. I would like to see it referenced more thoroughly, because it is so close to FA status. However, I cannot support it until proper referencing is done.
PDXblazers02:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Object per the concerns about the referencing, and I also think that the history section is a bit too long (Does the relocation of the Expos need to be here?) seeing as it has it's own main article.
The Halo (
talk)
01:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply