The article was promoted by Ian Rose 12:29, 14 May 2014 [1].
This is a small article about a very big painting. An epic description of sacred stories from Central Australia, it set a record for the price paid for Indigenous Australian art when it was bought by the National Gallery of Australia in 2007. hamiltonstone ( talk) 01:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Thanks Nikki! hamiltonstone ( talk) 03:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Overall, the article is pretty small and this might indeed be all we can get that is citeable - if there were any interviews where the artist had discussed the owrk or any more analysis of the themes in the painting (colours chosen/whatever), that would be good to add. However it is engagingly written and I can't see much wrong prosewise.
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs)
04:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
Otherwise looking on target on prose, pending reolution of comprehensiveness queries...
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs)
12:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
Hawkeye7 ( talk) 10:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Closing comment -- I didn't see a review of media licensing but the FURs for the two images employed look satisfactory to me, so we'll call it a day here, tks all. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 09:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Ian Rose 12:29, 14 May 2014 [1].
This is a small article about a very big painting. An epic description of sacred stories from Central Australia, it set a record for the price paid for Indigenous Australian art when it was bought by the National Gallery of Australia in 2007. hamiltonstone ( talk) 01:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Thanks Nikki! hamiltonstone ( talk) 03:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Overall, the article is pretty small and this might indeed be all we can get that is citeable - if there were any interviews where the artist had discussed the owrk or any more analysis of the themes in the painting (colours chosen/whatever), that would be good to add. However it is engagingly written and I can't see much wrong prosewise.
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs)
04:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
Otherwise looking on target on prose, pending reolution of comprehensiveness queries...
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs)
12:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
reply
Hawkeye7 ( talk) 10:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Closing comment -- I didn't see a review of media licensing but the FURs for the two images employed look satisfactory to me, so we'll call it a day here, tks all. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 09:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC) reply