The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 19:12, 10 October 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because this has to be one of the most detailed article on a Pixar film I have seen (the closest to this is Ratatouille, but it's not that detailed). This article is kept nicely and hasn't experience an edit war for a long time (I don't think it ever had an edit war). Bottom line is that this article should be nominated as a featured article. Secret Saturdays ( talk) 22:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC) reply
P.S. Even though I didn't significantly edit this article, I have permission from Immblueversion, who has.
The Artical looks fine for a FA if it is worked a bit more:
Oppose
Comment. Please add alt text to images; see WP:ALT. Eubulides ( talk) 23:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Source comments Oppose, largely on 1c Again, too many non-notable and non-reliable sources used in a pop culture article. Just about stopped short of suggesting a withdrawal beacuse of the nice shape it was in at GA [2]. What happened??
There's other ones which only meet the guidelines by the skin of their teeth. The film has had major international coverage and to use such quality sources is a pretty much a crime in my opinion.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 19:12, 10 October 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because this has to be one of the most detailed article on a Pixar film I have seen (the closest to this is Ratatouille, but it's not that detailed). This article is kept nicely and hasn't experience an edit war for a long time (I don't think it ever had an edit war). Bottom line is that this article should be nominated as a featured article. Secret Saturdays ( talk) 22:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC) reply
P.S. Even though I didn't significantly edit this article, I have permission from Immblueversion, who has.
The Artical looks fine for a FA if it is worked a bit more:
Oppose
Comment. Please add alt text to images; see WP:ALT. Eubulides ( talk) 23:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Source comments Oppose, largely on 1c Again, too many non-notable and non-reliable sources used in a pop culture article. Just about stopped short of suggesting a withdrawal beacuse of the nice shape it was in at GA [2]. What happened??
There's other ones which only meet the guidelines by the skin of their teeth. The film has had major international coverage and to use such quality sources is a pretty much a crime in my opinion.