The article was promoted 16:00, 27 February 2008.
This article is being resubmitted to FAC because it appears many of the previous issues that came up in last year's FAC have been resolved. Thegreatdr ( talk) 16:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
There seems to be a problem with the check external links link. So far, one link (Atlantic tropical systems of 1993) does exist, though the checker says it does not. All previously dead links now work. Thegreatdr ( talk) 02:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
MWR Avila 1995
. The first has a working link, the other doesn't. —
Dispenser
20:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
Support All the issues have been addressed. Great article. Weak Oppose The article's prose is great and most of the presentational style is good, but there are quite a few citation issues that should be addressed. When they are completed, I will gladly change my vote to Support.
Notes: This is really awkward, and the punctuation makes it hard to get through: can it be cleaned up somehow?
Also, most of the citations say Retrived on, a few say accessed, most of the full dates in citations are wikilinked, a few aren't, please make consistent. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
NOAA Question of the Month
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).The article was promoted 16:00, 27 February 2008.
This article is being resubmitted to FAC because it appears many of the previous issues that came up in last year's FAC have been resolved. Thegreatdr ( talk) 16:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
There seems to be a problem with the check external links link. So far, one link (Atlantic tropical systems of 1993) does exist, though the checker says it does not. All previously dead links now work. Thegreatdr ( talk) 02:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC) reply
MWR Avila 1995
. The first has a working link, the other doesn't. —
Dispenser
20:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
Support All the issues have been addressed. Great article. Weak Oppose The article's prose is great and most of the presentational style is good, but there are quite a few citation issues that should be addressed. When they are completed, I will gladly change my vote to Support.
Notes: This is really awkward, and the punctuation makes it hard to get through: can it be cleaned up somehow?
Also, most of the citations say Retrived on, a few say accessed, most of the full dates in citations are wikilinked, a few aren't, please make consistent. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply
NOAA Question of the Month
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).