The article was promoted by Ian Rose 15:05, 7 May 2014 [1].
This article is about the world's loudest cicada - it ran through FAC before but generated little interest...we pondered about the prose so it has been through Peer Review, which has been very helpful (and thanks to those who commented there!). This has helped massage its prose alot and we feel it is at or near FA level. Let us know what we can do to improve it. Cheers, Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 19:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Support; mostly had my say at PR. I still feel that the poems are a weak point to finish on (perhaps you could hide them in the middle of the paragraph somehow?), but that's a stylistic disagreement. A couple of comments... J Milburn ( talk) 19:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Image review
Nikkimaria ( talk) 21:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Notes
Support: I reviewed this article during PR and my concerns were addressed. It still seems in good shape. Praemonitus ( talk) 04:50, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments (and source review) by Sasata ( talk) 19:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Looks good, just nitpicks.
Closing comment -- I think we can safely call it a day on this review, if there's any further tweaks re. Sasata's comments then they can occur post-FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 13:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Ian Rose 15:05, 7 May 2014 [1].
This article is about the world's loudest cicada - it ran through FAC before but generated little interest...we pondered about the prose so it has been through Peer Review, which has been very helpful (and thanks to those who commented there!). This has helped massage its prose alot and we feel it is at or near FA level. Let us know what we can do to improve it. Cheers, Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 19:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Support; mostly had my say at PR. I still feel that the poems are a weak point to finish on (perhaps you could hide them in the middle of the paragraph somehow?), but that's a stylistic disagreement. A couple of comments... J Milburn ( talk) 19:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Image review
Nikkimaria ( talk) 21:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC) reply
Notes
Support: I reviewed this article during PR and my concerns were addressed. It still seems in good shape. Praemonitus ( talk) 04:50, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Comments (and source review) by Sasata ( talk) 19:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Looks good, just nitpicks.
Closing comment -- I think we can safely call it a day on this review, if there's any further tweaks re. Sasata's comments then they can occur post-FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 13:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC) reply