The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 20:16, 16 August 2008 [1].
In the article's previous FAC, a major objection was to the article being too new to pass FAC. I believe that the article has stabilised enough to pass the stability requirement of the featured article criteria, which I think is the only part it failed in its previous nomination (the objection about the image is subjective which not much can be done to fix).
Sceptre (
talk)
18:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
question Why is the BBC trademark, Image:TARDIS-trans.png, being used to advertise a competing commercial site and is this usage consistant with requirement three of the featured article criteria? Fasach Nua ( talk) 08:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply
As a registered user of Tardis wiki, I can assure Fasach Nua that it is not competing with the BBC. This seems to be an extemly bad guesture by someone who is so upset that he cannot get his way on one thing, that he stops an another editor getting his way on a completely different issue. Rather childish behaviour really. 81.157.235.65 ( talk) 10:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC) reply
* Oppose — For the most part this is a good article. I am, however, concerned that the non-free image is not used to its full potential. By sticking it at the top of the article -- away from the content it's providing critical commentary on -- I believe it's not "significantly increas[ing the] readers' understanding of the topic".
Matthew (
talk)
12:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC) (concerns met)
reply
The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 20:16, 16 August 2008 [1].
In the article's previous FAC, a major objection was to the article being too new to pass FAC. I believe that the article has stabilised enough to pass the stability requirement of the featured article criteria, which I think is the only part it failed in its previous nomination (the objection about the image is subjective which not much can be done to fix).
Sceptre (
talk)
18:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
question Why is the BBC trademark, Image:TARDIS-trans.png, being used to advertise a competing commercial site and is this usage consistant with requirement three of the featured article criteria? Fasach Nua ( talk) 08:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC) reply
As a registered user of Tardis wiki, I can assure Fasach Nua that it is not competing with the BBC. This seems to be an extemly bad guesture by someone who is so upset that he cannot get his way on one thing, that he stops an another editor getting his way on a completely different issue. Rather childish behaviour really. 81.157.235.65 ( talk) 10:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC) reply
* Oppose — For the most part this is a good article. I am, however, concerned that the non-free image is not used to its full potential. By sticking it at the top of the article -- away from the content it's providing critical commentary on -- I believe it's not "significantly increas[ing the] readers' understanding of the topic".
Matthew (
talk)
12:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC) (concerns met)
reply