The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 17:55, 25 April 2010 [1].
The Political Cesspool ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it now satisfies all the featured article criteria. You may want to look at the archived peer reviews ( 1, 2, and 3) and the previous FA nominations (1 and 2). For a more detailed explanation of why I feel this should be a featured article, read here.
Stonemason89 ( talk) 15:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Quick comment for now: some newspaper titles (Los Angeles Times, The Commercial Appeal, etc.) are not italicized in refs. There's just enough non-italics that I can't tell if that's intended. -- an odd name 22:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Images -
File:Politicalcesspoollogo.jpg has no valid FU rationale
Fasach Nua (
talk)
20:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 17:55, 25 April 2010 [1].
The Political Cesspool ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it now satisfies all the featured article criteria. You may want to look at the archived peer reviews ( 1, 2, and 3) and the previous FA nominations (1 and 2). For a more detailed explanation of why I feel this should be a featured article, read here.
Stonemason89 ( talk) 15:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Quick comment for now: some newspaper titles (Los Angeles Times, The Commercial Appeal, etc.) are not italicized in refs. There's just enough non-italics that I can't tell if that's intended. -- an odd name 22:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Images -
File:Politicalcesspoollogo.jpg has no valid FU rationale
Fasach Nua (
talk)
20:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
reply