The article was not promoted 03:52, 21 April 2007.
Seems to match Featured article criteria Bravedog 15:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Well written"-Yes, I suppose
"Comprehensive"-Agree strongly
"Factually accurate"-Lots of reliable sources
"Neutral"-Strongly agree
"Stable"-Definately
"a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the higher level of detail in the subsequent sections"-yes
"a system of hierarchical headings"-definately
"a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents"-Strongly agree
"images where they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Fair use images must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly"-Agree
"appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail"-agree Dalejenkins 16:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Quite simply it's too short. Buc 17:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted 03:52, 21 April 2007.
Seems to match Featured article criteria Bravedog 15:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Well written"-Yes, I suppose
"Comprehensive"-Agree strongly
"Factually accurate"-Lots of reliable sources
"Neutral"-Strongly agree
"Stable"-Definately
"a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the higher level of detail in the subsequent sections"-yes
"a system of hierarchical headings"-definately
"a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents"-Strongly agree
"images where they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Fair use images must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly"-Agree
"appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail"-agree Dalejenkins 16:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Quite simply it's too short. Buc 17:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC) reply