The article was promoted by Laser brain via FACBot ( talk) 28 July 2019 [1].
This article is about a song by Taylor Swift, which is hilariously titled "Style" (an ode to her ex Harry Styles?). The previous FAC gained two supports, no oppose, and detailed media and source reviews, but failed to pass the line. Hope it will attract more interest this time :), HĐ ( talk) 08:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Great work with the article. I also commented on the previous FAC, and I hope there is more activity with this go-around. It would be cool to have this featured on the front page on the day that her next album is released. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate any comments for my current FAC. Either way, have a great rest of your day and/or night! Aoba47 ( talk) 20:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I did a comprehensive sources review during the previous FAC, and the various issues I raised were resolved. There are no other issues I wish to raise in this current FAC. Concerning the italicization of the title in ref 15, mentioned above, this is a function of the "cite AV" template used. The title could easily be de-italicized, if it matters. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Commencing shortly. Kees08 (Talk) 01:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
My previous review still stands, so the media review is complete. Kees08 (Talk) 01:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Updated as per
Template:Infobox song#Parameters (easier than listing here, change as needed). The biggest difference is the addition of |studio=
. Much like "Records" in |label=
, "Studio" should be dropped for space considerations and since the parameter already includes it. Also, the use of "small" in infoboxes is discouraged, because it may cause
WP:ACCESS problems (see
MOS:SMALLTEXT). —
Ojorojo (
talk)
13:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Committing to reviewing this so it does not get archived again; will review sometime this weekend probably. Kees08 (Talk) 18:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I think that is all I have; the article is well-written. Kees08 (Talk) 01:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Recusing from coord duties to review following requests from the nominator... Having read and copyedited up to and including Music and lyrics, I don't see major issues at this stage. The prose seems reasonable, the quotes are attributed, the tone is neutral -- just one query:
I'll leave it there for now, I mainly just wanted to get a feel for the article's quality and so far it's positive. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 10:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Ian Rose: There has been further input into this review and thus far all have been positive. Any progress to promote/archive this FAC soon? HĐ ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
On skimming this to determine readiness for promotion, I'm concerned that the first passage I checked, "Swift, Payami, Martin, and Shellback wrote the song's lyrics", is contradicted by the Medium article in which Ljungfelt indicates that Swift and Martin wrote the lyrics for the song. Can you explain the disparity? Additional source spot-checks will probably be needed before I can consider promotion. I'm also concerned that this article continues a theme I've seen across many song articles here that published sheet music is cited for a generic set of musical "factoids" like key, tempo, and song structure. This has always struck me as WP:OR. The tempo of the song is listed on the sheet music, but who determined the key and song structure? I realize those things are evident to a musician interpreting the sheet music, interpreting a primary source is something we can't do here as editors. -- Laser brain (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
The article was promoted by Laser brain via FACBot ( talk) 28 July 2019 [1].
This article is about a song by Taylor Swift, which is hilariously titled "Style" (an ode to her ex Harry Styles?). The previous FAC gained two supports, no oppose, and detailed media and source reviews, but failed to pass the line. Hope it will attract more interest this time :), HĐ ( talk) 08:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Great work with the article. I also commented on the previous FAC, and I hope there is more activity with this go-around. It would be cool to have this featured on the front page on the day that her next album is released. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate any comments for my current FAC. Either way, have a great rest of your day and/or night! Aoba47 ( talk) 20:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I did a comprehensive sources review during the previous FAC, and the various issues I raised were resolved. There are no other issues I wish to raise in this current FAC. Concerning the italicization of the title in ref 15, mentioned above, this is a function of the "cite AV" template used. The title could easily be de-italicized, if it matters. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Commencing shortly. Kees08 (Talk) 01:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
My previous review still stands, so the media review is complete. Kees08 (Talk) 01:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Updated as per
Template:Infobox song#Parameters (easier than listing here, change as needed). The biggest difference is the addition of |studio=
. Much like "Records" in |label=
, "Studio" should be dropped for space considerations and since the parameter already includes it. Also, the use of "small" in infoboxes is discouraged, because it may cause
WP:ACCESS problems (see
MOS:SMALLTEXT). —
Ojorojo (
talk)
13:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Committing to reviewing this so it does not get archived again; will review sometime this weekend probably. Kees08 (Talk) 18:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I think that is all I have; the article is well-written. Kees08 (Talk) 01:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Recusing from coord duties to review following requests from the nominator... Having read and copyedited up to and including Music and lyrics, I don't see major issues at this stage. The prose seems reasonable, the quotes are attributed, the tone is neutral -- just one query:
I'll leave it there for now, I mainly just wanted to get a feel for the article's quality and so far it's positive. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 10:47, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Ian Rose: There has been further input into this review and thus far all have been positive. Any progress to promote/archive this FAC soon? HĐ ( talk) 02:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
On skimming this to determine readiness for promotion, I'm concerned that the first passage I checked, "Swift, Payami, Martin, and Shellback wrote the song's lyrics", is contradicted by the Medium article in which Ljungfelt indicates that Swift and Martin wrote the lyrics for the song. Can you explain the disparity? Additional source spot-checks will probably be needed before I can consider promotion. I'm also concerned that this article continues a theme I've seen across many song articles here that published sheet music is cited for a generic set of musical "factoids" like key, tempo, and song structure. This has always struck me as WP:OR. The tempo of the song is listed on the sheet music, but who determined the key and song structure? I realize those things are evident to a musician interpreting the sheet music, interpreting a primary source is something we can't do here as editors. -- Laser brain (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)