Self nom.This is a song by English band
Keane. I think it contains all the possible information that can be found around the Internet about the song. It includes information about its b-sides and the musical structure of the single, as well as cover versions--
Fluence02:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Hmmm... it was missing a references section for the notes in the article, so I added the section. It still seems awfully short on inline citations, but I havn't took an in-depth look.
RN04:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment - so that's who sings this song! Excellent. Haven't read the article, but I've wanted to know who sung it for quite a while now. Yes, I know. I've been living under a rock. So sue me. -
Ta bu shi da yu16:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
It's hard to find information in another place but Keaneshaped and Keane.at fansites. That's why there are only two references. All information is taken from that sites and the Official forum (exact link can't be given for reasons of the band. Link to official website where the forum can be found)
Fluence22:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
About the references, last time I forgot to write the notes section at the bottom but there were there before. Thanks to RN for writing it
Fluence22:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment- As far as I have gone into Keane research since two years, I find each and everything on this page and so I think it should go for featured status. Considering all the pics, the data, sheet music and what not, this article deserves the post.
Victoria Eleanor14:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Next to inline citations are within the article, the paragraphs are way too stubby, and there seems to be tons of listy parts. Also, no reference is made to how this track was critically recieved by noteworthy critics of the genre the song falls under which is necessary.
LuciferMorgan22:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment- That only shows you've never researched information about the song. Its Wikipedia article contains itself more information about the song than on every other place in the planet.
Fluence23:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment - The fact that a WP article has more information than any other resource on the planet is not a reason for it to be featured. FA's show the best of Wikipedia, not the best article of a subject.
Alexj200214:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment - I've seen several Featured articles even worse than this one so they cannot be called "the best of Wikipedia". Oh, and also, there are no piano rock critics. The song was treated as alternative, a wrong given genre.
Fluence22:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Very Slight Support. I support it because it took a lot of effort to get all that info on just one song. Maybe if you can add the meaning of the lyrics and some history behind it, it'll get more support, I am sure.
Jayant,17 Years, India •
contribs17:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Finish'. The article has officially failed now. For Jayant412, Keane hadn't wanted to give a meaning for the lyrics of none. I'll post the article in again :)
Fluence23:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Self nom.This is a song by English band
Keane. I think it contains all the possible information that can be found around the Internet about the song. It includes information about its b-sides and the musical structure of the single, as well as cover versions--
Fluence02:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Hmmm... it was missing a references section for the notes in the article, so I added the section. It still seems awfully short on inline citations, but I havn't took an in-depth look.
RN04:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment - so that's who sings this song! Excellent. Haven't read the article, but I've wanted to know who sung it for quite a while now. Yes, I know. I've been living under a rock. So sue me. -
Ta bu shi da yu16:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
It's hard to find information in another place but Keaneshaped and Keane.at fansites. That's why there are only two references. All information is taken from that sites and the Official forum (exact link can't be given for reasons of the band. Link to official website where the forum can be found)
Fluence22:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
About the references, last time I forgot to write the notes section at the bottom but there were there before. Thanks to RN for writing it
Fluence22:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment- As far as I have gone into Keane research since two years, I find each and everything on this page and so I think it should go for featured status. Considering all the pics, the data, sheet music and what not, this article deserves the post.
Victoria Eleanor14:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose Next to inline citations are within the article, the paragraphs are way too stubby, and there seems to be tons of listy parts. Also, no reference is made to how this track was critically recieved by noteworthy critics of the genre the song falls under which is necessary.
LuciferMorgan22:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment- That only shows you've never researched information about the song. Its Wikipedia article contains itself more information about the song than on every other place in the planet.
Fluence23:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment - The fact that a WP article has more information than any other resource on the planet is not a reason for it to be featured. FA's show the best of Wikipedia, not the best article of a subject.
Alexj200214:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment - I've seen several Featured articles even worse than this one so they cannot be called "the best of Wikipedia". Oh, and also, there are no piano rock critics. The song was treated as alternative, a wrong given genre.
Fluence22:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Very Slight Support. I support it because it took a lot of effort to get all that info on just one song. Maybe if you can add the meaning of the lyrics and some history behind it, it'll get more support, I am sure.
Jayant,17 Years, India •
contribs17:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Finish'. The article has officially failed now. For Jayant412, Keane hadn't wanted to give a meaning for the lyrics of none. I'll post the article in again :)
Fluence23:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)reply