The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 00:17, 21 March 2010 [1].
Sherman Minton ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Sherman Minton: New Deal Senator, Supreme Court Justice during the Cold War. An interesting man who was involved in alot of interesting things. After several weeks of improvement, a GA review, and thorough research, I believe this article now satisfies the FA criteria. — Charles Edward ( Talk | Contribs) 15:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC) reply
More later.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 13:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I will finish up later or tomorrow. I have taken the liberty of correcting minor errors, you might want to doublecheck.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 23:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC) reply
More:
I'll finish up later with the Supreme Court material.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 19:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)a bit more reply
And that's about it. Work on these, and I want to give it another read through. I'm not thrilled with the prose, but I think I will wind up supporting, but it may take more tweaking. I will probably be on only very limited time the next two or three days. But I think that with some attention to the prose (I've taken out some careless errors), I'll support his as a worthy addition to your Hoosier stable!-- Wehwalt ( talk) 00:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 00:17, 21 March 2010 [1].
Sherman Minton ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Sherman Minton: New Deal Senator, Supreme Court Justice during the Cold War. An interesting man who was involved in alot of interesting things. After several weeks of improvement, a GA review, and thorough research, I believe this article now satisfies the FA criteria. — Charles Edward ( Talk | Contribs) 15:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC) reply
More later.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 13:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC) reply
I will finish up later or tomorrow. I have taken the liberty of correcting minor errors, you might want to doublecheck.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 23:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC) reply
More:
I'll finish up later with the Supreme Court material.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 19:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)a bit more reply
And that's about it. Work on these, and I want to give it another read through. I'm not thrilled with the prose, but I think I will wind up supporting, but it may take more tweaking. I will probably be on only very limited time the next two or three days. But I think that with some attention to the prose (I've taken out some careless errors), I'll support his as a worthy addition to your Hoosier stable!-- Wehwalt ( talk) 00:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC) reply