The article was promoted by GrahamColm 17:19, 11 September 2012 [1].
Seated Liberty dollar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... we think it meets the criteria. The Seated Liberty dollar was struck for a third of a century, though never in large numbers. It was struck in response to deposits of silver by people and corporations. With a glut of silver about to hit the Mint, it was abolished, an action which became known as the Crime of '73 and which led to the great silver/gold debates of the late 19th century. Note that RHM22 is presently inactive, so I'll be handling this for us both. Wehwalt ( talk) 23:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Sources review (no spotchecks possible):
Other than the above minor issues, sources look OK. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Support: I gave this article a going-over at its peer review. All seems in order with this latest instalment of a well established and always informative series. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate comments:
I didn't notice any other issues. Ucucha ( talk) 15:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by GrahamColm 17:19, 11 September 2012 [1].
Seated Liberty dollar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... we think it meets the criteria. The Seated Liberty dollar was struck for a third of a century, though never in large numbers. It was struck in response to deposits of silver by people and corporations. With a glut of silver about to hit the Mint, it was abolished, an action which became known as the Crime of '73 and which led to the great silver/gold debates of the late 19th century. Note that RHM22 is presently inactive, so I'll be handling this for us both. Wehwalt ( talk) 23:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Sources review (no spotchecks possible):
Other than the above minor issues, sources look OK. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Support: I gave this article a going-over at its peer review. All seems in order with this latest instalment of a well established and always informative series. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Delegate comments:
I didn't notice any other issues. Ucucha ( talk) 15:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply