The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 17:50, 26 November 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
This article passed GA in August and a MILHIST A-class review in September. It's somewhat short, but the ship was sunk after having been in commission for less than a year. I look forward to any and all suggestions from reviewers. Thanks in advance. Parsecboy ( talk) 00:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments No dab links, no external links (I made the "training" link an InterWiki), the four images have alt text with no obvious problems, and dates throughout the article are consistent Day Month Year. Yay. -- an odd name 01:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment I made a small clarification in the intro. Otherwise, I think it's a good article. Amandajm ( talk) 10:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment
Other than that an excellent informative article in my opinion.-- EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 13:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
PS: just a thought, should a quick line to be added to talk about the KMS Lützow (not completed iirc) or the Lützow class heavy cruisers? Although they are not related to this ship and they are all named after the Prussian guy (i would imagine) it may not be approbriate.-- EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 13:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments - Support
Overall a nice article. I look forward to supporting when these issues are rectified. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
17:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 17:50, 26 November 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
This article passed GA in August and a MILHIST A-class review in September. It's somewhat short, but the ship was sunk after having been in commission for less than a year. I look forward to any and all suggestions from reviewers. Thanks in advance. Parsecboy ( talk) 00:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments No dab links, no external links (I made the "training" link an InterWiki), the four images have alt text with no obvious problems, and dates throughout the article are consistent Day Month Year. Yay. -- an odd name 01:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment I made a small clarification in the intro. Otherwise, I think it's a good article. Amandajm ( talk) 10:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment
Other than that an excellent informative article in my opinion.-- EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 13:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
PS: just a thought, should a quick line to be added to talk about the KMS Lützow (not completed iirc) or the Lützow class heavy cruisers? Although they are not related to this ship and they are all named after the Prussian guy (i would imagine) it may not be approbriate.-- EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 13:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments - Support
Overall a nice article. I look forward to supporting when these issues are rectified. Dana boomer ( talk) 01:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments
SandyGeorgia (
Talk)
17:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
reply