The article was promoted by Graham Colm 17:21, 29 March 2014 [1].
Another German battleship article, this was the 2nd flagship of the High Seas Fleet (after the recently promoted SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm). She served extensively in the first decade of the 20th century, but was too old for much service during World War I; she spent the majority of the war as a floating headquarters for the commander of the HSF. For what it's worth, only one more article will be necessary to turn this current GT into the second-largest FT on Wikipedia (by only one article to this related topic). Thanks to all who take the time to review the article. Parsecboy ( talk) 16:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I've looked at the changes made since I reviewed this for A-class. These are my edits. - Dank ( push to talk) 16:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Support Comments
Images are all appropriately licensed.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 12:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Support -- As I have a FAC open myself at the moment, I'm recusing myself from delegate duties here and there to review articles...
Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 13:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Support — I have reviewed this article before, great work. MisterBee1966 ( talk) 12:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Graham Colm 17:21, 29 March 2014 [1].
Another German battleship article, this was the 2nd flagship of the High Seas Fleet (after the recently promoted SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm). She served extensively in the first decade of the 20th century, but was too old for much service during World War I; she spent the majority of the war as a floating headquarters for the commander of the HSF. For what it's worth, only one more article will be necessary to turn this current GT into the second-largest FT on Wikipedia (by only one article to this related topic). Thanks to all who take the time to review the article. Parsecboy ( talk) 16:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. I've looked at the changes made since I reviewed this for A-class. These are my edits. - Dank ( push to talk) 16:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Support Comments
Images are all appropriately licensed.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 12:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Support -- As I have a FAC open myself at the moment, I'm recusing myself from delegate duties here and there to review articles...
Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 13:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Support — I have reviewed this article before, great work. MisterBee1966 ( talk) 12:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply