The article was not promoted by Karanacs 18:52, 20 September 2011 [1].
S&M (song) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... I really want this article to be an FA. It is one of Rihanna's most well known songs for a variety of reasons, such as it's controversial lyrics and music video, the remix with Britney Spears and the backlash the music video and live performances have created. I think this makes for a very good FAC as it isn't just a standard article listing the same normal facts. It has content which not very many other articles have. Also, could reviewers please look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S&M (song)/archive1 and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S&M (song)/archive2 before they comment, so that they do not write any points to address which may conflict with what has already been raised in the previous two FACs. Thank you. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 13:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done. I'm deliberately ignoring everything on the talk page and in prior reviews, and am focusing only on what is currently present in the article. Nikkimaria ( talk) 01:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Still, the article has a lot of issues other than that. Yet this is the third nomination. Previous comments / critique might help. -- Efe ( talk) 04:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Calvin999, your excessive use of bolding is making this FAC harder to read; it's not necessary to bold your responses. Bolding is typically reserved at FAC for Supports and Opposes. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 02:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by Karanacs 18:52, 20 September 2011 [1].
S&M (song) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... I really want this article to be an FA. It is one of Rihanna's most well known songs for a variety of reasons, such as it's controversial lyrics and music video, the remix with Britney Spears and the backlash the music video and live performances have created. I think this makes for a very good FAC as it isn't just a standard article listing the same normal facts. It has content which not very many other articles have. Also, could reviewers please look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S&M (song)/archive1 and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S&M (song)/archive2 before they comment, so that they do not write any points to address which may conflict with what has already been raised in the previous two FACs. Thank you. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 13:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done. I'm deliberately ignoring everything on the talk page and in prior reviews, and am focusing only on what is currently present in the article. Nikkimaria ( talk) 01:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Still, the article has a lot of issues other than that. Yet this is the third nomination. Previous comments / critique might help. -- Efe ( talk) 04:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Calvin999, your excessive use of bolding is making this FAC harder to read; it's not necessary to bold your responses. Bolding is typically reserved at FAC for Supports and Opposes. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 02:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC) reply