Oppose. No references, no internal photos.
Batmanand |
Talk 10:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose for no refs/inline citation and lots of listed text (rather than prose). I'd love to see internal photos, but they aren't a requirement IMO.
Staxringold 13:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment: Rather than having an "Introduction" section, think of incorporating this information into the lead section – after all, introducing the subject is what they're for. Also, more information on the architecture would be helpful – the second paragraph of the redundant Introduction section would be a good starting point. –
HAM 14:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Lack of references, lead does not comply with
WP:LEAD, there are serious structural/organisational issues and it is certainly not comprehensive ("Now the hall is used as a live music venue."??)
Mikker(...) 00:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. No references, no internal photos.
Batmanand |
Talk 10:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose for no refs/inline citation and lots of listed text (rather than prose). I'd love to see internal photos, but they aren't a requirement IMO.
Staxringold 13:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Comment: Rather than having an "Introduction" section, think of incorporating this information into the lead section – after all, introducing the subject is what they're for. Also, more information on the architecture would be helpful – the second paragraph of the redundant Introduction section would be a good starting point. –
HAM 14:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Lack of references, lead does not comply with
WP:LEAD, there are serious structural/organisational issues and it is certainly not comprehensive ("Now the hall is used as a live music venue."??)
Mikker(...) 00:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)reply