The article was not promoted by Karanacs 16:41, 17 October 2011 [1].
Rehab (Rihanna song) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... the article got prose "lifting". This is my second nomination of it. As I said in the first nomination, I worked really hard on it for maybe 3 months with a help from a lot of users that can be seen in the second peer review of it. At first time I addressed some of the prose issue by myself, however I couldn't do it with the others. So the user Baffle gab (and also Chaosdruid) made a major copy-edit in it according to the FAC comments. If you oppose, please address the issues. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose
The references are pulling this article down, as they need to be perfect. Also, there are a lot of prose issues. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 22:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose by Wikipedian Penguin (See review below) ( edit conflict)
( WP:LEAD and general comments)
(Production and recording)
(Composition)
(Release)
(Critical reception)
(Chart performance)
(Music video)
(Live performances)
(References)
Once again, I am prepared to change my "Oppose" if I feel that the article is ready. So, let me know promptly which comments you have addressed or when you have addressed them all, so that I can strike out the ones you did correctly. Looking at the length of this review, it may also need to be collapsed, but delegates will do that if they want. Note that I conflicted with Calvin, so he may have already brought up some of the issues that I did. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Procedural close/withdraw - the previous nomination was closed only three days ago. Per the FAC rules, you are required to get delegate permission if you wish to renominate before two weeks have elapsed. It appears you are getting some of the same reviewers opposing as you did in the previous review, so it would be beneficial to take some time to address substantive points before renominating. Nikkimaria ( talk) 00:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by Karanacs 16:41, 17 October 2011 [1].
Rehab (Rihanna song) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because... the article got prose "lifting". This is my second nomination of it. As I said in the first nomination, I worked really hard on it for maybe 3 months with a help from a lot of users that can be seen in the second peer review of it. At first time I addressed some of the prose issue by myself, however I couldn't do it with the others. So the user Baffle gab (and also Chaosdruid) made a major copy-edit in it according to the FAC comments. If you oppose, please address the issues. — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 21:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose
The references are pulling this article down, as they need to be perfect. Also, there are a lot of prose issues. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 22:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose by Wikipedian Penguin (See review below) ( edit conflict)
( WP:LEAD and general comments)
(Production and recording)
(Composition)
(Release)
(Critical reception)
(Chart performance)
(Music video)
(Live performances)
(References)
Once again, I am prepared to change my "Oppose" if I feel that the article is ready. So, let me know promptly which comments you have addressed or when you have addressed them all, so that I can strike out the ones you did correctly. Looking at the length of this review, it may also need to be collapsed, but delegates will do that if they want. Note that I conflicted with Calvin, so he may have already brought up some of the issues that I did. — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 23:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Procedural close/withdraw - the previous nomination was closed only three days ago. Per the FAC rules, you are required to get delegate permission if you wish to renominate before two weeks have elapsed. It appears you are getting some of the same reviewers opposing as you did in the previous review, so it would be beneficial to take some time to address substantive points before renominating. Nikkimaria ( talk) 00:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC) reply