The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 01:57, 17 December 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it has been a Good Article since March 2007, and I think that significant improvements have been made since then that qualifies it for FA status. - Drilnoth ( talk) 21:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Image review - All of the images in this article are non-free and none of them have sufficient rationales at this point.
Each and every one of these fair use rationales has to make a specific case for each image. See this dispatch on non-free images for help on writing fair use justifications. Many of these covers seem very similar, so I'm not sure how necessary they all are. We usually only include one book cover in articles about pieces of literature. If you want to include more than one, the article is going to have to discuss the cover itself - that is, it will have to contain critical commentary on the cover which must be accompanied by the image in order to be understood. Awadewit ( talk) 00:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
The article looks good, but an overall copyedit is needed. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment—The article is decently developed and readable, but I have a few issues that I'd like to see be addressed:
Sorry but I can not lend support yet.— RJH ( talk) 20:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments: So here's the work that still needs to be done. Please let me know if I missed anything; I'll start actually working on cleaning these things up today or tomorrow.
- Drilnoth ( talk) 21:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 01:57, 17 December 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it has been a Good Article since March 2007, and I think that significant improvements have been made since then that qualifies it for FA status. - Drilnoth ( talk) 21:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Image review - All of the images in this article are non-free and none of them have sufficient rationales at this point.
Each and every one of these fair use rationales has to make a specific case for each image. See this dispatch on non-free images for help on writing fair use justifications. Many of these covers seem very similar, so I'm not sure how necessary they all are. We usually only include one book cover in articles about pieces of literature. If you want to include more than one, the article is going to have to discuss the cover itself - that is, it will have to contain critical commentary on the cover which must be accompanied by the image in order to be understood. Awadewit ( talk) 00:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
The article looks good, but an overall copyedit is needed. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment—The article is decently developed and readable, but I have a few issues that I'd like to see be addressed:
Sorry but I can not lend support yet.— RJH ( talk) 20:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments: So here's the work that still needs to be done. Please let me know if I missed anything; I'll start actually working on cleaning these things up today or tomorrow.
- Drilnoth ( talk) 21:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply