The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 22:41, 16 January 2013 [1].
Prometheus (film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because the thing that laid it's child in my chest cavity told me too. I am told it read the article on Prometheus and decided I would make a fertile breeding ground for a hyper efficient article editing machine that bleeds text. On a personal level I have been working on the article for several months, taking it from a relative bare space to what is today: a thorough document on the film Prometheus that covers every major topic on an interesting and long in development project by the master Ridley Scott. I have been helped to this end by many other impregnated users including but not limited to User:IllaZilla, User:Polisher of Cobwebs and User:Flax5 plus a thorough copy edit by User:Baffle gab1978 to bring it to the shining standard of alien infestation that it is today.. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 01:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC) reply
|first=
field.To summarise, I think the article is succinct and comprehensive without being overinclusive. I disagree with Nick-D above as the issue of the scripts and their writing is important to understand how the film developed (there is much discussion about this around so it's a pretty notable topic). The marketing too was quite detailed and worthy of the same. Despite its length, it doesn't come across as long in reading it.
The prose is pretty good actually, and no clangers jumped out at me to fix. My biggest reservations are with the plot section which reads as maybe a tad too clipped. I Need to read it again.
I think it is pretty close to featured status, just need to re-read and have a think about it. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 22:41, 16 January 2013 [1].
Prometheus (film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because the thing that laid it's child in my chest cavity told me too. I am told it read the article on Prometheus and decided I would make a fertile breeding ground for a hyper efficient article editing machine that bleeds text. On a personal level I have been working on the article for several months, taking it from a relative bare space to what is today: a thorough document on the film Prometheus that covers every major topic on an interesting and long in development project by the master Ridley Scott. I have been helped to this end by many other impregnated users including but not limited to User:IllaZilla, User:Polisher of Cobwebs and User:Flax5 plus a thorough copy edit by User:Baffle gab1978 to bring it to the shining standard of alien infestation that it is today.. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 01:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC) reply
|first=
field.To summarise, I think the article is succinct and comprehensive without being overinclusive. I disagree with Nick-D above as the issue of the scripts and their writing is important to understand how the film developed (there is much discussion about this around so it's a pretty notable topic). The marketing too was quite detailed and worthy of the same. Despite its length, it doesn't come across as long in reading it.
The prose is pretty good actually, and no clangers jumped out at me to fix. My biggest reservations are with the plot section which reads as maybe a tad too clipped. I Need to read it again.
I think it is pretty close to featured status, just need to re-read and have a think about it. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC) reply