The article was promoted by Ian Rose 10:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
Perseus (constellation) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
Since the last FAC (where issues raised included prose and sourcing of Chinese section), the Chinese section has been sourced with better sources and the prose copyedited by two editors. Hopefully it flows better this time folks. Have at it - the two of us will try to deal with concerns promptly. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 04:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Images are fine, captions are good. Nikkimaria ( talk) 14:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Support Comments from Jim usual sound effort, but a couple of queries
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
08:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
reply
Just glancing at the lead I don't think it is quite detailed enough to effectively summarize the article. It should be both informative and concise and I think you've missed out some important details. I think "Perseus is bordered by Aries and Taurus to the south, Auriga to the east, Camelopardalis and Cassiopea to the north, and Andromeda and Triangulum to the west" for a start should be mentioned in the lead. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Cautious support. I think this looks better now (I had concerns re Chinese astronomy last time). The Schlegel reference is extremely old; are we confident that more modern scholarship has not led to any reinterpretation or better understanding of how the Chinese constellations are to be interpreted? The last FAC i think ironed out prose issues. hamiltonstone ( talk) 13:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review -- I'm sure I haven't been as thorough as Nikki or Brian but we can't keep this one open forever...
Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 08:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Ian Rose 10:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC) [1]. reply
Perseus (constellation) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Toolbox |
---|
Since the last FAC (where issues raised included prose and sourcing of Chinese section), the Chinese section has been sourced with better sources and the prose copyedited by two editors. Hopefully it flows better this time folks. Have at it - the two of us will try to deal with concerns promptly. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 04:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Images are fine, captions are good. Nikkimaria ( talk) 14:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC) reply
Support Comments from Jim usual sound effort, but a couple of queries
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
08:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
reply
Just glancing at the lead I don't think it is quite detailed enough to effectively summarize the article. It should be both informative and concise and I think you've missed out some important details. I think "Perseus is bordered by Aries and Taurus to the south, Auriga to the east, Camelopardalis and Cassiopea to the north, and Andromeda and Triangulum to the west" for a start should be mentioned in the lead. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Cautious support. I think this looks better now (I had concerns re Chinese astronomy last time). The Schlegel reference is extremely old; are we confident that more modern scholarship has not led to any reinterpretation or better understanding of how the Chinese constellations are to be interpreted? The last FAC i think ironed out prose issues. hamiltonstone ( talk) 13:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Source review -- I'm sure I haven't been as thorough as Nikki or Brian but we can't keep this one open forever...
Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 08:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC) reply