The article was not promoted 21:04, 31 July 2007.
This article has recently became a Good article and in my opinion it fits the criteria of a Featured Article. The article is very well written and is engaging, The article covers the topic of parapsychology very well and neutrally without negating any facts or failing to mention specific topics within parapsychology, the article is sourced by reliable citations throughout, I along with a few others recently spent the past few weeks rewriting the article and it is neutral and stable. All in all a great article. I would appreciate constructive criticism that I or others can use to improve the article to FA criteria if you feel it isn't already currently. Please take the time to add a review to help us improve this article. Thanks. Wikidudeman (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC) reply
*Oppose per above. Looks good, though. --
Kaypoh
10:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
SandyGeorgia, in what way do you see it as imbalanced? Martinphi ( Talk Ψ Contribs) 05:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted 21:04, 31 July 2007.
This article has recently became a Good article and in my opinion it fits the criteria of a Featured Article. The article is very well written and is engaging, The article covers the topic of parapsychology very well and neutrally without negating any facts or failing to mention specific topics within parapsychology, the article is sourced by reliable citations throughout, I along with a few others recently spent the past few weeks rewriting the article and it is neutral and stable. All in all a great article. I would appreciate constructive criticism that I or others can use to improve the article to FA criteria if you feel it isn't already currently. Please take the time to add a review to help us improve this article. Thanks. Wikidudeman (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC) reply
*Oppose per above. Looks good, though. --
Kaypoh
10:08, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
SandyGeorgia, in what way do you see it as imbalanced? Martinphi ( Talk Ψ Contribs) 05:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC) reply