The article was promoted by GrahamColm 17:13, 9 December 2012 [1].
Pale Crag Martin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Only seven swallow FAs, must be time for another one! Unlike my last two FACs, this species isn't (a) extinct or (b) restricted to war-torn Congo, so there's a bit more content than in those articles. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Support from Maralia This looks great. I fixed a few typos. There were a couple of bits that I didn't quite understand:
You might consider moving the wikispecies & commons links higher up on the page since they're more relevant than the navigation templates that precede them. The picture of the eggs could use an alt text description, too. An excellent article; well done! Maralia ( talk) 06:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Addressed prose comments from Crisco 1492 moved to talk
Support, very nice. I made a few small changes. One comment-
Other than that, very strong. J Milburn ( talk) 21:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Sources review
No spotchecks carried out. Subject to the above minor fixes, sources and citations look fine. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Support. Well-written and appears to cover all the major aspects of the topic.
Ucucha (
talk)
15:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
Support. Reads good, and I couldn't think of anything to add in the text. There's still the lack of images showing the upper part of the bird itself, which is a bit of a shame. How about this drawing? [2] Other than that, I found this [3], which is kind of useless though. FunkMonk ( talk) 18:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by GrahamColm 17:13, 9 December 2012 [1].
Pale Crag Martin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Only seven swallow FAs, must be time for another one! Unlike my last two FACs, this species isn't (a) extinct or (b) restricted to war-torn Congo, so there's a bit more content than in those articles. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Support from Maralia This looks great. I fixed a few typos. There were a couple of bits that I didn't quite understand:
You might consider moving the wikispecies & commons links higher up on the page since they're more relevant than the navigation templates that precede them. The picture of the eggs could use an alt text description, too. An excellent article; well done! Maralia ( talk) 06:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Addressed prose comments from Crisco 1492 moved to talk
Support, very nice. I made a few small changes. One comment-
Other than that, very strong. J Milburn ( talk) 21:17, 28 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Sources review
No spotchecks carried out. Subject to the above minor fixes, sources and citations look fine. Brianboulton ( talk) 22:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC) reply
Support. Well-written and appears to cover all the major aspects of the topic.
Ucucha (
talk)
15:57, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
Support. Reads good, and I couldn't think of anything to add in the text. There's still the lack of images showing the upper part of the bird itself, which is a bit of a shame. How about this drawing? [2] Other than that, I found this [3], which is kind of useless though. FunkMonk ( talk) 18:26, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply