The article was promoted by Karanacs 17:39, 2 March 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Those who have watched baseball in the past 12 months know this name. Those who haven't, this is a biography of a major leaguer whose career was just beginning to rise when he was killed last year. His legacy lives on though, and while this FA is rather short, it is a comprehensive bio on a career that unfortunately was not. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments – Few quick post-Super Bowl comments; will try to review the rest at a later time.
I've never reviewed a featured article candidate before, but Wizardman asked me if I might consider reviewing this one. Hopefully I don't step on anyone's toes.
This is a good-looking article. It was a pleasure to review. Cheers. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 17:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Support. All of my comments have been satisfactorily addressed or sufficiently explained away, and I fixed the inflation template, so I see no reason not to support this FA candidate. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 02:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Otherwise, nearly there. Sources look okay and I can't see any comprehensiveness issues or other deal-breakers. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 02:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Karanacs 17:39, 2 March 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
Those who have watched baseball in the past 12 months know this name. Those who haven't, this is a biography of a major leaguer whose career was just beginning to rise when he was killed last year. His legacy lives on though, and while this FA is rather short, it is a comprehensive bio on a career that unfortunately was not. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Comments – Few quick post-Super Bowl comments; will try to review the rest at a later time.
I've never reviewed a featured article candidate before, but Wizardman asked me if I might consider reviewing this one. Hopefully I don't step on anyone's toes.
This is a good-looking article. It was a pleasure to review. Cheers. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 17:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Support. All of my comments have been satisfactorily addressed or sufficiently explained away, and I fixed the inflation template, so I see no reason not to support this FA candidate. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 02:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Otherwise, nearly there. Sources look okay and I can't see any comprehensiveness issues or other deal-breakers. Casliber ( talk · contribs) 02:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC) reply