New World Order (conspiracy theory)
New World Order (conspiracy theory) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): *** patchiman*** *** talk to me!*** 17:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article because... It is an amazing article that manages to be neutral, lengthy but not padded and very clean. *** patchiman*** *** talk to me!*** 17:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Trancluded on 20:28, December 5, 2011. SandyGeorgia ( Talk)
- Comment Citations from books, for example from A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America, should be split into multiple citations with the specific page number from which the information is drawn. --
Brandt Luke Zorn (
talk)
00:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Also, prose problems are apparent, copyedit needed, nominator has never edited the article, and the main contributors were not consulted. Removing, premature, see WP:FAC instructions. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{ featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
New World Order (conspiracy theory)
New World Order (conspiracy theory) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): *** patchiman*** *** talk to me!*** 17:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article because... It is an amazing article that manages to be neutral, lengthy but not padded and very clean. *** patchiman*** *** talk to me!*** 17:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Trancluded on 20:28, December 5, 2011. SandyGeorgia ( Talk)
- Comment Citations from books, for example from A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America, should be split into multiple citations with the specific page number from which the information is drawn. --
Brandt Luke Zorn (
talk)
00:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Also, prose problems are apparent, copyedit needed, nominator has never edited the article, and the main contributors were not consulted. Removing, premature, see WP:FAC instructions. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{ featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)