Montenegro

This article seems very well written and contains extensive references to different sections ( Economy of Montenegro, History of Montenegro, etc.). I would consider it to fit the featured article criteria very well, as it is also of appropriate length itself and has many pictures (particularly at the bottom). Nicholasink 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Comment What about references to things besides sections? That's what really counts.-- Rmky87 04:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply

• Object Sorry, but with only 7 footnotes for a 40kb article, especially when all 7 of those are websites (there's got to be lots of books on such a large topic), this article won't be able to pass WP:FA yet. Suggest peer review. AZ  _t 16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Further comment Suggestions to help improve the article - the following were based on the reviewing script. The lead needs expansion per WP:LEAD, nbsp's are needed ( WP:MOSNUM), conversions should use standard abbreviations, repetition of title in headings should not occur ( WP:MSH), and switching back and forth between American and British English spellings (probably just stick with british spellings, I guess? ex: neighbor (a), meter (a), organize (a), recognise (b), offence (b), and organisation (b)). AZ  _t 18:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
• Object per huge image gallery with no text to accompany it. Please consult WP:NOT. -- Ghirla ^-трёп- 09:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Comment. That is sheer bullshit (not intended as a personal attack). There is text to accompany the "huge" image gallery. --Crna Gora 04:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
• Support as per nom. --Crna Gora 04:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply