This article seems very well written and contains extensive references to different sections ( Economy of Montenegro, History of Montenegro, etc.). I would consider it to fit the featured article criteria very well, as it is also of appropriate length itself and has many pictures (particularly at the bottom). Nicholasink 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment What about references to things besides sections? That's what really counts.-- Rmky87 04:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Object Sorry, but with only 7 footnotes for a 40kb article, especially when all 7 of those are websites (there's got to be lots of books on such a large topic), this article won't be able to pass
WP:FA yet. Suggest
peer review.
AZ
t
16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Further comment Suggestions to help improve the article - the following were based on the reviewing script. The lead needs expansion per WP:LEAD, nbsp's are needed ( WP:MOSNUM), conversions should use standard abbreviations, repetition of title in headings should not occur ( WP:MSH), and switching back and forth between American and British English spellings (probably just stick with british spellings, I guess? ex: neighbor (a), meter (a), organize (a), recognise (b), offence (b), and organisation (b)). AZ t 18:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Object per huge image gallery with no text to accompany it. Please consult
WP:NOT. --
Ghirla
-трёп-
09:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. That is sheer bullshit (not intended as a personal attack). There is text to accompany the "huge" image gallery. --Crna Gora 04:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. --Crna Gora 04:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
This article seems very well written and contains extensive references to different sections ( Economy of Montenegro, History of Montenegro, etc.). I would consider it to fit the featured article criteria very well, as it is also of appropriate length itself and has many pictures (particularly at the bottom). Nicholasink 02:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment What about references to things besides sections? That's what really counts.-- Rmky87 04:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Object Sorry, but with only 7 footnotes for a 40kb article, especially when all 7 of those are websites (there's got to be lots of books on such a large topic), this article won't be able to pass
WP:FA yet. Suggest
peer review.
AZ
t
16:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Further comment Suggestions to help improve the article - the following were based on the reviewing script. The lead needs expansion per WP:LEAD, nbsp's are needed ( WP:MOSNUM), conversions should use standard abbreviations, repetition of title in headings should not occur ( WP:MSH), and switching back and forth between American and British English spellings (probably just stick with british spellings, I guess? ex: neighbor (a), meter (a), organize (a), recognise (b), offence (b), and organisation (b)). AZ t 18:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Object per huge image gallery with no text to accompany it. Please consult
WP:NOT. --
Ghirla
-трёп-
09:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. That is sheer bullshit (not intended as a personal attack). There is text to accompany the "huge" image gallery. --Crna Gora 04:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. --Crna Gora 04:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)