The article was not promoted 16:18, 9 February 2008.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it is pretty comprehensive by this point. Sarsaparilla ( talk) 17:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC) reply
That's it for now. Carre ( talk) 10:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The age difference created a height differential. Sarsaparilla ( talk) 00:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose There's still a lot of work to do. Prose is still way short of the standards for featured articles. I gave the first two sections a semi-thorough read and I still found a few cases of unreferenced or nebulous assertions. The text is also bizarrely underlinked. I don't see how one can hope to fully understand the article without links to cervix, fornix, G-spot, clitoris, Doggy style. In contrast, there are wikilinks for pillow, German language, French language and Spanish language... I also think a case could be made that links to articles on ancient civilizations would make sense in the first section, though I understand there may be disagreement on that front. (How many people know about Trobrianders?) Other small points
Pichpich ( talk) 20:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment The article mentions that bonobos use this position but not that among all extant primates it is unique to humans and bonobos. This was proposed by some evolutionary biologists as a synapomorphy establishing bonobos and humans as sister species. -- Una Smith ( talk) 04:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment will need a G rated image if ever featured on the main page-- 68.45.82.237 ( talk) 06:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted 16:18, 9 February 2008.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it is pretty comprehensive by this point. Sarsaparilla ( talk) 17:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC) reply
That's it for now. Carre ( talk) 10:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The age difference created a height differential. Sarsaparilla ( talk) 00:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Oppose There's still a lot of work to do. Prose is still way short of the standards for featured articles. I gave the first two sections a semi-thorough read and I still found a few cases of unreferenced or nebulous assertions. The text is also bizarrely underlinked. I don't see how one can hope to fully understand the article without links to cervix, fornix, G-spot, clitoris, Doggy style. In contrast, there are wikilinks for pillow, German language, French language and Spanish language... I also think a case could be made that links to articles on ancient civilizations would make sense in the first section, though I understand there may be disagreement on that front. (How many people know about Trobrianders?) Other small points
Pichpich ( talk) 20:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment The article mentions that bonobos use this position but not that among all extant primates it is unique to humans and bonobos. This was proposed by some evolutionary biologists as a synapomorphy establishing bonobos and humans as sister species. -- Una Smith ( talk) 04:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment will need a G rated image if ever featured on the main page-- 68.45.82.237 ( talk) 06:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply