This article is about Hurricane Michael's meteorological history. Keep in mind that this article contains some technical aspects due to its nature (too much for a main storm article); I have attempted to dumb them down to the best of my ability, but that was difficult for some items.
NoahTalk23:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The current source link goes to a republishing of the original (archived version). Which one should be used? The first one or the current one?
NoahTalk01:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, with the caveat that I reviewed the article prior to FAC, and identified any issues I had with the article. My only slight concern was whether the article should've been split in the first place (given that the main Michael article is still on the short side), but assuming that article will be expanded, then this individual MH article would be needed. ♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
15:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. This article plus the main article on the hurricane add up to less than 7500 words, much of which is duplicated. That would not be a particularly long FA, so I see no reason for a separate article on the meteorological history yet. I am not going to oppose because I don't think there's consensus at FAC that "merge to main article" is a valid oppose reason, but I am disinclined to do a full review because I suspect a future merge is likely -- this is something that's happened at least once or twice in the past with small hurricane FAs.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
11:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I opened a merge discussion myself despite the standing moratorium as it shouldn't prevent us from improving articles. Merging the explanations as to how Michael did what it did would help people understand better.
NoahTalk12:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn by nominator.
Closing note: This
candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the
bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
This article is about Hurricane Michael's meteorological history. Keep in mind that this article contains some technical aspects due to its nature (too much for a main storm article); I have attempted to dumb them down to the best of my ability, but that was difficult for some items.
NoahTalk23:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The current source link goes to a republishing of the original (archived version). Which one should be used? The first one or the current one?
NoahTalk01:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, with the caveat that I reviewed the article prior to FAC, and identified any issues I had with the article. My only slight concern was whether the article should've been split in the first place (given that the main Michael article is still on the short side), but assuming that article will be expanded, then this individual MH article would be needed. ♫
Hurricanehink (
talk)
15:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. This article plus the main article on the hurricane add up to less than 7500 words, much of which is duplicated. That would not be a particularly long FA, so I see no reason for a separate article on the meteorological history yet. I am not going to oppose because I don't think there's consensus at FAC that "merge to main article" is a valid oppose reason, but I am disinclined to do a full review because I suspect a future merge is likely -- this is something that's happened at least once or twice in the past with small hurricane FAs.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
11:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I opened a merge discussion myself despite the standing moratorium as it shouldn't prevent us from improving articles. Merging the explanations as to how Michael did what it did would help people understand better.
NoahTalk12:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn by nominator.
Closing note: This
candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the
bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.