The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 14:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC) [1]. reply
We have FAs on six French composers: Bizet, Fauré, Massenet, Messiaen, Poulenc and Saint-Saëns. I hope Ravel will be admitted to that Panthéon. The article has had the benefit of a peer review from Wikipedia's finest, to whom I am most grateful. I have enjoyed writing about Ravel – an enigmatic figure – and I hope reviewers here, and other visitors to the page, will enjoy reading about him and his music. – Tim riley talk 16:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support Found very little fault with it during the PR, certainly meets the criteria!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support La belle, Monsieur Tim riley. Another happy peer reviewer. Continue your good work. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 00:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support. Bravo! I also participated in the peer review. I read the article on three occasions then and see little need to do so again before providing my support here. "I do have one comment, about the sentence "Some of his piano music, such as Gaspard de la nuit (1908) is exceptionally difficult to play, and his complex orchestral works such as Daphnis et Chloé (1912) require skilful balance in performance." Unless I am misreading the syntax, it seems to me that there should be a comma after "(1908)" to isolate "such as Gaspard de la nuit (1908)". Syek88 ( talk) 04:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Support: Read it at peer review, all my points satisfactorily resolved – tried hard to find a few more to raise here, but couldn't. I'm glad someone is still writing top-quality composer articles, and this is fit to stand with the best of them. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support. My few comments were dealt with at PR, and a further read-through from me shows no additional problems: indeed, the article has been strengthened since then. - SchroCat ( talk) 19:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Image review
Note -- strong support and checks complete but as it's only been open a week I'd like to give the review another few days to see if anyone else would like to comment. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 13:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Thanks for another really good article which is very worthy description of this wonderful composer. I cound't find anything to comment on, and I support this nomination. Cg2p0B0u8m ( talk) 18:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 14:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC) [1]. reply
We have FAs on six French composers: Bizet, Fauré, Massenet, Messiaen, Poulenc and Saint-Saëns. I hope Ravel will be admitted to that Panthéon. The article has had the benefit of a peer review from Wikipedia's finest, to whom I am most grateful. I have enjoyed writing about Ravel – an enigmatic figure – and I hope reviewers here, and other visitors to the page, will enjoy reading about him and his music. – Tim riley talk 16:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support Found very little fault with it during the PR, certainly meets the criteria!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:16, 18 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support La belle, Monsieur Tim riley. Another happy peer reviewer. Continue your good work. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 00:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support. Bravo! I also participated in the peer review. I read the article on three occasions then and see little need to do so again before providing my support here. "I do have one comment, about the sentence "Some of his piano music, such as Gaspard de la nuit (1908) is exceptionally difficult to play, and his complex orchestral works such as Daphnis et Chloé (1912) require skilful balance in performance." Unless I am misreading the syntax, it seems to me that there should be a comma after "(1908)" to isolate "such as Gaspard de la nuit (1908)". Syek88 ( talk) 04:56, 19 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Support: Read it at peer review, all my points satisfactorily resolved – tried hard to find a few more to raise here, but couldn't. I'm glad someone is still writing top-quality composer articles, and this is fit to stand with the best of them. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Support. My few comments were dealt with at PR, and a further read-through from me shows no additional problems: indeed, the article has been strengthened since then. - SchroCat ( talk) 19:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Image review
Note -- strong support and checks complete but as it's only been open a week I'd like to give the review another few days to see if anyone else would like to comment. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 13:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Thanks for another really good article which is very worthy description of this wonderful composer. I cound't find anything to comment on, and I support this nomination. Cg2p0B0u8m ( talk) 18:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC) reply