The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
Martha Logan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the criteria. It has been a GA for a number of years and I feel that article has depth and breadth of coverage, but I would appreciate feedback or comments on things that need to be fixed. Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 05:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose at this time. I'm sorry, but I'm not convinced that this article is ready for FA status.
For me, this article's falling a good way short of the FA benchmark, sorry. J Milburn ( talk) 23:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose Half the references are to episodes of 24. This means that you are mainly using primary sources, and that you are doing a significant amount of original research as the entire Characterization section is based on your individual interpretation of the show. 122.172.22.133 ( talk) 03:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose Sorry Steven but it's not even close to FA quality. The article should have undergone a peer review before this in which you'd have been told how much work is needed.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
Martha Logan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel it meets the criteria. It has been a GA for a number of years and I feel that article has depth and breadth of coverage, but I would appreciate feedback or comments on things that need to be fixed. Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 05:24, 3 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose at this time. I'm sorry, but I'm not convinced that this article is ready for FA status.
For me, this article's falling a good way short of the FA benchmark, sorry. J Milburn ( talk) 23:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose Half the references are to episodes of 24. This means that you are mainly using primary sources, and that you are doing a significant amount of original research as the entire Characterization section is based on your individual interpretation of the show. 122.172.22.133 ( talk) 03:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose Sorry Steven but it's not even close to FA quality. The article should have undergone a peer review before this in which you'd have been told how much work is needed.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC) reply