The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 13:40, 26 March 2011 [1].
Mangalorean Catholics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
This is the article’s second nomination for FA status. It currently holds GA status. I believe that this article satisfies the current criteria for FA, as it is well-researched and well-referenced with credible sources. All the images are either in the public domain or have been released under Creative Commons licenses. Having failed the previous nomination, the article has since been thoroughly copy-edited by User:Diannaa and User:Mike Searson, not to mention myself. The spellings have been anglicized to correspond with Indian English, which uses the British variant of spelling. Furthermore, the article has undergone a peer review. See this. All the issues raised therein have been addressed. Another user Kensplanet had previously requested a peer review for the purpose of ascertaining whether it met the FA requirements or not. See here. In the interest of avoiding repetitive questions, i would suggest that the concerned reviewer/s go through the above links, as well as this link to the article’s previous nomination. Thanks. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 13:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose - not to be discouraging, but I don't feel this article is ready for FA status at this time. A sampling of concerns:
Oppose. I too am sorry to be discouraging, but I have to agree with Nikkimaria that the article isn't yet ready. I'll give a few more examples, and I stress that these are merely examples:
Oppose - the prose needs work. I found way too many repetitions of "Mangalorean Catholic" all over the prose, which is repetitious and interrupts the flow of the prose. It's also way over linked - there is no need to link things like "spices" "pineapple", "Roman Catholic", too many links to Portugese, and similar.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 13:40, 26 March 2011 [1].
Mangalorean Catholics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
This is the article’s second nomination for FA status. It currently holds GA status. I believe that this article satisfies the current criteria for FA, as it is well-researched and well-referenced with credible sources. All the images are either in the public domain or have been released under Creative Commons licenses. Having failed the previous nomination, the article has since been thoroughly copy-edited by User:Diannaa and User:Mike Searson, not to mention myself. The spellings have been anglicized to correspond with Indian English, which uses the British variant of spelling. Furthermore, the article has undergone a peer review. See this. All the issues raised therein have been addressed. Another user Kensplanet had previously requested a peer review for the purpose of ascertaining whether it met the FA requirements or not. See here. In the interest of avoiding repetitive questions, i would suggest that the concerned reviewer/s go through the above links, as well as this link to the article’s previous nomination. Thanks. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 13:52, 24 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose - not to be discouraging, but I don't feel this article is ready for FA status at this time. A sampling of concerns:
Oppose. I too am sorry to be discouraging, but I have to agree with Nikkimaria that the article isn't yet ready. I'll give a few more examples, and I stress that these are merely examples:
Oppose - the prose needs work. I found way too many repetitions of "Mangalorean Catholic" all over the prose, which is repetitious and interrupts the flow of the prose. It's also way over linked - there is no need to link things like "spices" "pineapple", "Roman Catholic", too many links to Portugese, and similar.