The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:14, 28 May 2008 [1].
This article was the Collaboration of the Month for WP:NBA, and after a lot of edits, I think it is ready to be a FA. Fire away. Noble Story ( talk) 02:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply
SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments - A very good article, but still some small issues.
Comment—I ask the Director to disregard the raft of drive-by "voting" at the top. This is directly opposed to the purpose and process of FAC. Oppose—Not written to the required professional standard. The reasons given at the top for the nomination were feeble, and this is born out by the quality of the article. Here are just a few random examples.
Plus much more. Needs a new collaborator to straighten it out; should be promoted, but not until cleaned up. TONY (talk) 11:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:14, 28 May 2008 [1].
This article was the Collaboration of the Month for WP:NBA, and after a lot of edits, I think it is ready to be a FA. Fire away. Noble Story ( talk) 02:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply
SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
Comments - A very good article, but still some small issues.
Comment—I ask the Director to disregard the raft of drive-by "voting" at the top. This is directly opposed to the purpose and process of FAC. Oppose—Not written to the required professional standard. The reasons given at the top for the nomination were feeble, and this is born out by the quality of the article. Here are just a few random examples.
Plus much more. Needs a new collaborator to straighten it out; should be promoted, but not until cleaned up. TONY (talk) 11:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC) reply