The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:39, 20 October 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because, as most do, I feel it meets
FA criteria. It has went under three different
GA reviews under one nomination, two different peer reviews (one before GA and one after GA), and under multiple copyedits and smaller reviews.
Will
C 07:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Oppose - Sorry, but I don't believe this meets the standards set by recent wrestling PPV articles. Here's a rundown of some issues with the article.
Overall, this is not yet ready to become featured, at least in my view. More copy-editing would be beneficial, and some trimming of unnecessary details would help too. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 00:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:39, 20 October 2008 [1].
I'm nominating this article for featured article because, as most do, I feel it meets
FA criteria. It has went under three different
GA reviews under one nomination, two different peer reviews (one before GA and one after GA), and under multiple copyedits and smaller reviews.
Will
C 07:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
reply
Oppose - Sorry, but I don't believe this meets the standards set by recent wrestling PPV articles. Here's a rundown of some issues with the article.
Overall, this is not yet ready to become featured, at least in my view. More copy-editing would be beneficial, and some trimming of unnecessary details would help too. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 00:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC) reply