The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 23:18, 23 January 2016 [1].
This article is about... a coin that was actually sold successfully. The design may not have been all that was desired, but it's still nice and there's a nice little backstory about the towns of Lexington and Concord, such rivals that they apparently had to have different congressmen. I enjoyed researching this one, it's been a long time since high school history ... Wehwalt ( talk) 23:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Support - Only two comments, both nitpicks.
Image review
Comments
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. - Dank ( push to talk) 22:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Support – Meets all the FA criteria in my view. As usual in this series, the article is a model of its kind, and will, I have no doubt whatever, further enhance Wikipedia's status as a go-to source for numismatists. – Tim riley talk 14:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Support: with a few minor quibbles and observations:
The usual solid job. I echo Tim's views on this remarkable series, now more than 50 strong by my count. And the redlink informs me that we are by no means finished yet. Keep going. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Sources review
The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot ( talk) 23:18, 23 January 2016 [1].
This article is about... a coin that was actually sold successfully. The design may not have been all that was desired, but it's still nice and there's a nice little backstory about the towns of Lexington and Concord, such rivals that they apparently had to have different congressmen. I enjoyed researching this one, it's been a long time since high school history ... Wehwalt ( talk) 23:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Support - Only two comments, both nitpicks.
Image review
Comments
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. - Dank ( push to talk) 22:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Support – Meets all the FA criteria in my view. As usual in this series, the article is a model of its kind, and will, I have no doubt whatever, further enhance Wikipedia's status as a go-to source for numismatists. – Tim riley talk 14:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Support: with a few minor quibbles and observations:
The usual solid job. I echo Tim's views on this remarkable series, now more than 50 strong by my count. And the redlink informs me that we are by no means finished yet. Keep going. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Sources review