The article was not promoted by Karanacs 21:49, 30 May 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe that it meets the FA criteria. Epeefleche ( talk) 07:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm sure there's more, I just don't have the time to do a complete review just yet. When this is all fixed, I'll take a look back. Wizardman 15:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Strong oppose - Per everything above. Not enough citations, proseline throughout, and a stubby 2005 summary, just to name a few things. I also think this currently fails the GA criteria, and suggest that a peer review be requested before any future GA/FA nom. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 18:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments - here are two examples from many of why this article does not satisfy the criteria:
The article was not promoted by Karanacs 21:49, 30 May 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe that it meets the FA criteria. Epeefleche ( talk) 07:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
I'm sure there's more, I just don't have the time to do a complete review just yet. When this is all fixed, I'll take a look back. Wizardman 15:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Strong oppose - Per everything above. Not enough citations, proseline throughout, and a stubby 2005 summary, just to name a few things. I also think this currently fails the GA criteria, and suggest that a peer review be requested before any future GA/FA nom. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 18:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments - here are two examples from many of why this article does not satisfy the criteria: