The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 14:35, 23 September 2010 [1].
John Babcock ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that it meets all the criteria of a featured article, and over half a year has passed since the subject's death, making it less susceptible to major changes in the future. It had an A-class review at the Military History Wikiproject where all concerns were addressed, but did not pass because it did not attract enough reviewers. It did, however, pass a Good Article review and was kept during the GA sweeps process. Canadian Paul 17:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment. No problems with dablinks; the external link to Video Interview with John Babcock is dead. PL290 ( talk) 19:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Weak oppose - interesting article, and I'd love to be able to support, but I don't think it's quite at FA standard. Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 14:35, 23 September 2010 [1].
John Babcock ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because I feel that it meets all the criteria of a featured article, and over half a year has passed since the subject's death, making it less susceptible to major changes in the future. It had an A-class review at the Military History Wikiproject where all concerns were addressed, but did not pass because it did not attract enough reviewers. It did, however, pass a Good Article review and was kept during the GA sweeps process. Canadian Paul 17:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment. No problems with dablinks; the external link to Video Interview with John Babcock is dead. PL290 ( talk) 19:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Weak oppose - interesting article, and I'd love to be able to support, but I don't think it's quite at FA standard. Nikkimaria ( talk) 03:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC) reply