The article was promoted by GrahamColm 10:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
James B. Longacre ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because… I think it meets the criteria. James B. Longacre was an artist who was successful in two somewhat different forms of art, first as a plate engraver, then as a designer of coins as the fourth Chief Engraver of the United States Mint. Liberally illustrated, as is proper in an article on an artist. Enjoy. Wehwalt ( talk) 01:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Comments on prose
The usual meticulous research has produced a well-informed account with excellent illustrations. I imagine that the above will not involve too much pain in addressing, and I look forward to supporting in due course. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Image check - all OK. Sources and authors provided (PD-age, US-government and coins, OTRS).
Support - Well researched, nicely formatted and written, and interesting! For some reason I laughed at the Peter the eagle part - who knew? Anyway, a few very minor nitpicks, but nothing to stop me from supporting:
The article was promoted by GrahamColm 10:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
James B. Longacre ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because… I think it meets the criteria. James B. Longacre was an artist who was successful in two somewhat different forms of art, first as a plate engraver, then as a designer of coins as the fourth Chief Engraver of the United States Mint. Liberally illustrated, as is proper in an article on an artist. Enjoy. Wehwalt ( talk) 01:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Comments on prose
The usual meticulous research has produced a well-informed account with excellent illustrations. I imagine that the above will not involve too much pain in addressing, and I look forward to supporting in due course. Brianboulton ( talk) 00:21, 24 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Image check - all OK. Sources and authors provided (PD-age, US-government and coins, OTRS).
Support - Well researched, nicely formatted and written, and interesting! For some reason I laughed at the Peter the eagle part - who knew? Anyway, a few very minor nitpicks, but nothing to stop me from supporting: