The article was not promoted by Karanacs 15:49, 22 September 2010 [1].
Illinois (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because it met all of the requirements for GA status and was then further amended based on those recommendations and well as the suggestions at its first FA nomination and its peer-review; I have also asked for feedback from relevant WikiProjects. The article at present is stable and no changes that are suggested here should be a serious impediment to FA status. User:Jujutacular and to a lesser extent myself ( User:Koavf) have been the primary contributors. I am willing to amend the article based on comments here and I have posted to Jujutacular's talk to inform him of this FA nomination. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Sources comment: Sources looked OK at the last FAC, subject to a minor issue re retrieval dates. The same issue requires that for consistency, retrieval dates are added to 5, 17 and 29. Otherwise no further issues. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by Karanacs 15:49, 22 September 2010 [1].
Illinois (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because it met all of the requirements for GA status and was then further amended based on those recommendations and well as the suggestions at its first FA nomination and its peer-review; I have also asked for feedback from relevant WikiProjects. The article at present is stable and no changes that are suggested here should be a serious impediment to FA status. User:Jujutacular and to a lesser extent myself ( User:Koavf) have been the primary contributors. I am willing to amend the article based on comments here and I have posted to Jujutacular's talk to inform him of this FA nomination. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Sources comment: Sources looked OK at the last FAC, subject to a minor issue re retrieval dates. The same issue requires that for consistency, retrieval dates are added to 5, 17 and 29. Otherwise no further issues. Brianboulton ( talk) 15:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:48, 13 September 2010 (UTC) reply