The article was promoted by Raul654 10:55, 9 March 2009 [1].
I began working on this article back in October. It passed WP:GA in November. Then I began working on it again in January, and had both an informal and a formal peer review. The park has an interesting history that made it easy to contribute to. I feel that it meets all the featured article criteria. Grsz 11 22:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comments - I have many fond memories of Idlewild from when I was a kid, so it's interesting to see it here – I learned quite a bit about the history of the park from the article. A couple comments about the article:
Good job with the article, and good luck with the FAC. - Algorerhythms ( talk) 22:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments - Nice to see something different here, in the form of an amusement park. Haven't been to one in 16+ years myself, though. Here are my initial thoughts.
That covers most of the body, and what I'm reading looks quite good to me. Take a look at these for now, and I'll be back soon to review the rest. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 20:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Image review as follows: For discussion —
Serious concerns —
Needs attention, serious ones on the last two images. Jappalang ( talk) 02:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, but I found things to do, such as:
The article was promoted by Raul654 10:55, 9 March 2009 [1].
I began working on this article back in October. It passed WP:GA in November. Then I began working on it again in January, and had both an informal and a formal peer review. The park has an interesting history that made it easy to contribute to. I feel that it meets all the featured article criteria. Grsz 11 22:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comments - I have many fond memories of Idlewild from when I was a kid, so it's interesting to see it here – I learned quite a bit about the history of the park from the article. A couple comments about the article:
Good job with the article, and good luck with the FAC. - Algorerhythms ( talk) 22:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Comments - Nice to see something different here, in the form of an amusement park. Haven't been to one in 16+ years myself, though. Here are my initial thoughts.
That covers most of the body, and what I'm reading looks quite good to me. Take a look at these for now, and I'll be back soon to review the rest. Giants2008 ( 17-14) 20:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Image review as follows: For discussion —
Serious concerns —
Needs attention, serious ones on the last two images. Jappalang ( talk) 02:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Support, but I found things to do, such as: