The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:07, 25 June 2008 [1].
Self-nomination I'm nominating this article for featured article because I feel it meets the Featured article criteria. The article is comprehensive and fully referenced and has been peer reviewed and copy-edited. Mattinbgn\ talk 09:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Very good work, as always. Support. A few musings:
That's up to the "Captain of Australia" section done. Will try to do the rest tomorrow or Thursday. Daniel ( talk) 13:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Support Comments Overall very nicely written. I will defer to editors that understand cricket to ensure that the cricket terminology, etc., is proper.
* The tense shift in the quote after Doctors noted that Trott continually stood in one place… is jarring
This article is close. Most of what I found are nitpicks. —
Bellhalla (
talk)
13:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Comments - Another strong cricket article. What else is new? Here are my nit-picks.
I'd review more, but Sir Donald is calling from wherever he is for a look. There seem to be some duplicate links later in the article, so watch out for those. Giants2008 ( talk) 22:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
That's the lead done... some general comments;
All sources seem OK. I'll try to get to the rest of the prose some time soon - ping me if I try and weasel out of it! ;-) giggy ( :O) 11:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:07, 25 June 2008 [1].
Self-nomination I'm nominating this article for featured article because I feel it meets the Featured article criteria. The article is comprehensive and fully referenced and has been peer reviewed and copy-edited. Mattinbgn\ talk 09:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Very good work, as always. Support. A few musings:
That's up to the "Captain of Australia" section done. Will try to do the rest tomorrow or Thursday. Daniel ( talk) 13:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Support Comments Overall very nicely written. I will defer to editors that understand cricket to ensure that the cricket terminology, etc., is proper.
* The tense shift in the quote after Doctors noted that Trott continually stood in one place… is jarring
This article is close. Most of what I found are nitpicks. —
Bellhalla (
talk)
13:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Comments
Comments - Another strong cricket article. What else is new? Here are my nit-picks.
I'd review more, but Sir Donald is calling from wherever he is for a look. There seem to be some duplicate links later in the article, so watch out for those. Giants2008 ( talk) 22:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
That's the lead done... some general comments;
All sources seem OK. I'll try to get to the rest of the prose some time soon - ping me if I try and weasel out of it! ;-) giggy ( :O) 11:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC) reply