The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 21:11, 31 October 2008 [1].
Gary King ( talk) 19:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comments
Nergaal ( talk) 23:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Giggy's comments
Giggy ( talk) 04:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Support as all comments addressed. Giggy ( talk) 06:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments by Guyinblack25:
Over this is good article, and is close to FA quality. The article is well sourced and fairly well writtern, especially the "Synopsis" section, very well balanced. There are some issues that stood out to me I believe should be addressed though.
Hope these help. The article has improved since it's first FAC and is shaping up nicely. Keep up the good work. ( Guyinblack25 talk 17:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)) reply
The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 21:11, 31 October 2008 [1].
Gary King ( talk) 19:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments -
Comments
Nergaal ( talk) 23:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Giggy's comments
Giggy ( talk) 04:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Support as all comments addressed. Giggy ( talk) 06:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments by Guyinblack25:
Over this is good article, and is close to FA quality. The article is well sourced and fairly well writtern, especially the "Synopsis" section, very well balanced. There are some issues that stood out to me I believe should be addressed though.
Hope these help. The article has improved since it's first FAC and is shaping up nicely. Keep up the good work. ( Guyinblack25 talk 17:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)) reply