The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
HTC One ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Me and several over editors have put a lot of time and effort into this article. I got it up to Good status, and even after a peer review where literally nothing happened, a few more editors joined in to make further improvements to the article. But now, I think we're ready for the big time. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose for now, pending the changes below. In restrospect, there are too many issues that would need to be addressed for me to even re-consider my stance. (edit) As the primary contributor of the
Samsung Galaxy S III article, I can identify several similarities between that particular article and this. It takes a lot of effort in researching about a topic like phones and following up by writing and polishing an article such as this one. I wish you all best in your effort to get this to FA -- let's hope this would be the first phone article to get that distinction. --
Sp33dyphil ©
hat
ontributions
05:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
At the moment I am slightly leaning towards oppose, as I think the article has got several more issues. I would like to hear a few comments from one or two other un-involved reviewers, and see my points addressed, before I can shift my stance.-- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 07:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
HTC One ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Me and several over editors have put a lot of time and effort into this article. I got it up to Good status, and even after a peer review where literally nothing happened, a few more editors joined in to make further improvements to the article. But now, I think we're ready for the big time. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Oppose for now, pending the changes below. In restrospect, there are too many issues that would need to be addressed for me to even re-consider my stance. (edit) As the primary contributor of the
Samsung Galaxy S III article, I can identify several similarities between that particular article and this. It takes a lot of effort in researching about a topic like phones and following up by writing and polishing an article such as this one. I wish you all best in your effort to get this to FA -- let's hope this would be the first phone article to get that distinction. --
Sp33dyphil ©
hat
ontributions
05:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
At the moment I am slightly leaning towards oppose, as I think the article has got several more issues. I would like to hear a few comments from one or two other un-involved reviewers, and see my points addressed, before I can shift my stance.-- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 07:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply