The article was promoted 04:36, 22 January 2008.
Hello, I recently rewrote this article on the penultimate episode of the third season of Lost. Self-nominate, – thedemonhog talk • edits 19:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support per all concerns addressed at Wikipedia:Peer review/Greatest Hits (Lost)/archive1. Just a few things I didn't notice or may not have been there before:
Otherwise, good stuff. • 97198 talk 01:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Meets all FA criteria, well done. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 04:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support two great episode articles (maybe three), hope more come next. Also, see if the DVD featurette for "Greatest Hits" can provide more info. igordebraga ≠ 20:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose. But I still can't see why you want to dilute your useful links with trivial ones to the major anglophone countries. Who's going to interrupt their read and rush to the US article? "Compare the season's average of 14.6 million."—This sentence suddenly addresses the reader directly; the tone needs to be recast. This is poorly written. Here are random examples from the top. Nearly every sentence needs fiddling. Don't just correct these examples: find someone to run through the whole article.
The content is just so trashy that I seriously wonder how we can call this "among our best work". To deliver it in trashy prose is even worse. Tony (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted 04:36, 22 January 2008.
Hello, I recently rewrote this article on the penultimate episode of the third season of Lost. Self-nominate, – thedemonhog talk • edits 19:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support per all concerns addressed at Wikipedia:Peer review/Greatest Hits (Lost)/archive1. Just a few things I didn't notice or may not have been there before:
Otherwise, good stuff. • 97198 talk 01:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Meets all FA criteria, well done. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 04:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support two great episode articles (maybe three), hope more come next. Also, see if the DVD featurette for "Greatest Hits" can provide more info. igordebraga ≠ 20:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose. But I still can't see why you want to dilute your useful links with trivial ones to the major anglophone countries. Who's going to interrupt their read and rush to the US article? "Compare the season's average of 14.6 million."—This sentence suddenly addresses the reader directly; the tone needs to be recast. This is poorly written. Here are random examples from the top. Nearly every sentence needs fiddling. Don't just correct these examples: find someone to run through the whole article.
The content is just so trashy that I seriously wonder how we can call this "among our best work". To deliver it in trashy prose is even worse. Tony (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply