The article was promoted by Ucucha 16:09, 28 March 2012 [1].
George Went Hensley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
George Went Hensley was a fascinating, but little known, figure in American Christianity who pioneered the practice of snake handling. This article had an unsuccessful nomination last month. It was archived after three weeks with no supports and no opposes but we got a lot of valuable feedback and are trying again, having tried to implement said feedback. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Nothing else from me. This is a very interesting read. -- Cassianto ( talk) 10:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Images: Ok, but not perfect. The free image is great, the non-free one appropriate. I'm assuming there isn't much choice for non-free images, but do we know the author/copyright holder of the current image? If not, then that's OK, as I do feel that there is enough sourcing information present. Is it perhaps from a newspaper? If so, it's not ideal. J Milburn ( talk) 00:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Support Great article about a fascinating figure. I have only one comment so far:
Delegate's comments - Looking good, but I think we should let this nomination run for a few more days. I won't be insisting on any spotchecks on this occasion, but I can't speak on behalf of the other delegates. Graham Colm ( talk) 22:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by Ucucha 16:09, 28 March 2012 [1].
George Went Hensley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
George Went Hensley was a fascinating, but little known, figure in American Christianity who pioneered the practice of snake handling. This article had an unsuccessful nomination last month. It was archived after three weeks with no supports and no opposes but we got a lot of valuable feedback and are trying again, having tried to implement said feedback. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Nothing else from me. This is a very interesting read. -- Cassianto ( talk) 10:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Images: Ok, but not perfect. The free image is great, the non-free one appropriate. I'm assuming there isn't much choice for non-free images, but do we know the author/copyright holder of the current image? If not, then that's OK, as I do feel that there is enough sourcing information present. Is it perhaps from a newspaper? If so, it's not ideal. J Milburn ( talk) 00:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Support Great article about a fascinating figure. I have only one comment so far:
Delegate's comments - Looking good, but I think we should let this nomination run for a few more days. I won't be insisting on any spotchecks on this occasion, but I can't speak on behalf of the other delegates. Graham Colm ( talk) 22:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC) reply