The article was archived by David Fuchs via FACBot ( talk) 6 February 2024 [1].
This article is about geodesy - the science of measuring the earth and other planets and their moons. Its main purpose is to collect data reliably for mapping, navigation, natural resources exploration, and scientific research. Geodesy is so important that virtually entire world depends on it in everyday activities, from positioning and transportation to timing and trade. Tinterest ( talk) 03:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose, suggest withdrawal - unfortunately this falls well short of the FA criteria, particularly in terms of sourcing - much of the current content is lacking citations. Nikkimaria ( talk) 04:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Hilarious - none of the above commenters is an expert, so the above "expert" opinions don't matter. Or as experts will notice: the commenters fail the weighted mean universal criterion - in which an expert's weight = 1 and amateur's weight = 0. Tinterest ( talk) 15:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Tinterest please reread the FAC instructions; articles should only be nominated by significant contributors to the article, of which you are not, and need to meet the featured article criteria, which require content be sourced to high-quality reliable sources. I am closing this nomination. I strongly suggest you familiarize yourself with our content and conduct policies or your time on Wikipedia is liable to be frustrating and short. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 15:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The article was archived by David Fuchs via FACBot ( talk) 6 February 2024 [1].
This article is about geodesy - the science of measuring the earth and other planets and their moons. Its main purpose is to collect data reliably for mapping, navigation, natural resources exploration, and scientific research. Geodesy is so important that virtually entire world depends on it in everyday activities, from positioning and transportation to timing and trade. Tinterest ( talk) 03:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose, suggest withdrawal - unfortunately this falls well short of the FA criteria, particularly in terms of sourcing - much of the current content is lacking citations. Nikkimaria ( talk) 04:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Hilarious - none of the above commenters is an expert, so the above "expert" opinions don't matter. Or as experts will notice: the commenters fail the weighted mean universal criterion - in which an expert's weight = 1 and amateur's weight = 0. Tinterest ( talk) 15:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Tinterest please reread the FAC instructions; articles should only be nominated by significant contributors to the article, of which you are not, and need to meet the featured article criteria, which require content be sourced to high-quality reliable sources. I am closing this nomination. I strongly suggest you familiarize yourself with our content and conduct policies or your time on Wikipedia is liable to be frustrating and short. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 15:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)