The article was promoted by GrahamColm 10:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
Gather Together in My Name ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because, as part of my on-going quest to improve Maya Angelou articles, it's this one's turn to submit to FAC. I also think it's good to go. A question that comes up in almost every review of these articles is regarding capitalization. Here's the explanation: [2] Thanks; I look forward to the feedback. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 04:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
As per my standard review strategy, this one looks almost good enough to be a featured article. I'll have a handful of very minor concerns related primarily to prose. Please feel free to strike items as you resolve them, or I can come along later and strike them for ease of reading and navigation. Feel free to disagree with or question my reasoning on any of these.
Lead section:
Title section looks good. No issues here.
Plot summary:
I'll review the remaining sections within the next few days. If you haven't heard back from me by the weekend, feel free to give me a ping at my talk page. It all looks good, though. No major issues as far as I can tell. Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 18:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Sourcing do-over:
Image Check
Selection is good, an both are licensed properly..-- Dom497 ( talk) 23:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC) reply
Comments from TonyTheTiger
Addressed comments moved to talk page. — Cirt ( talk) 23:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted by GrahamColm 10:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC) [1]. reply
Gather Together in My Name ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because, as part of my on-going quest to improve Maya Angelou articles, it's this one's turn to submit to FAC. I also think it's good to go. A question that comes up in almost every review of these articles is regarding capitalization. Here's the explanation: [2] Thanks; I look forward to the feedback. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 04:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC) reply
As per my standard review strategy, this one looks almost good enough to be a featured article. I'll have a handful of very minor concerns related primarily to prose. Please feel free to strike items as you resolve them, or I can come along later and strike them for ease of reading and navigation. Feel free to disagree with or question my reasoning on any of these.
Lead section:
Title section looks good. No issues here.
Plot summary:
I'll review the remaining sections within the next few days. If you haven't heard back from me by the weekend, feel free to give me a ping at my talk page. It all looks good, though. No major issues as far as I can tell. Evanh2008 ( talk| contribs) 18:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Source review - spotchecks not done
Sourcing do-over:
Image Check
Selection is good, an both are licensed properly..-- Dom497 ( talk) 23:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC) reply
Comments from TonyTheTiger
Addressed comments moved to talk page. — Cirt ( talk) 23:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC) reply