The article was promoted 16:00, 27 February 2008.
Self-nominator. The article, which is about the largest moon in the Solar System, has been significantly expanded and copy-edited for the last two months. It has passed through the PR process and I believe now satisfies FA criteria. Ruslik ( talk) 14:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
weak support. From the standpoints of comprehensiveness illustration and citation, excellent. But it could still use a grammatical/semantic going-over. EDIT: Just did a quick workthrough. Will come back later. Serendi pod ous 14:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
::The heating mechanism required to produce the disrupted surface geology is of particular interest. - this strikes me as redundant, especially if the "unsolved" is changed to something like "intriguing" in the previuous sentence. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Casliber (
talk •
contribs)
04:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
I've been trying to eliminate duplicate blue links. There's probably still a few, as there were a lot to begin with. If there's a link in the lead, I allow a second one later. Marskell ( talk) 11:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The article was promoted 16:00, 27 February 2008.
Self-nominator. The article, which is about the largest moon in the Solar System, has been significantly expanded and copy-edited for the last two months. It has passed through the PR process and I believe now satisfies FA criteria. Ruslik ( talk) 14:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
weak support. From the standpoints of comprehensiveness illustration and citation, excellent. But it could still use a grammatical/semantic going-over. EDIT: Just did a quick workthrough. Will come back later. Serendi pod ous 14:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
::The heating mechanism required to produce the disrupted surface geology is of particular interest. - this strikes me as redundant, especially if the "unsolved" is changed to something like "intriguing" in the previuous sentence. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Casliber (
talk •
contribs)
04:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
reply
I've been trying to eliminate duplicate blue links. There's probably still a few, as there were a lot to begin with. If there's a link in the lead, I allow a second one later. Marskell ( talk) 11:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC) reply