The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 22:37, 18 March 2011 [1].
Frost Bank Tower ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because it meets all of the requirements. All statements included in the GA nomination and peer reviews have been fixed, according to those statements. If the article is close to FA, I can fix things as the nomination continues. By the way, I'm only 11, so please, not too harsh. TheAustinMan ( talk) 17:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose - welcome to FAC! I don't mean to be discouraging, but I don't feel this article is yet at FA standards, although I'm open to changing my mind if you're able to resolve my concerns. If you need something below to be further explained, please let me know
Comments – Hello! Welcome to FAC! I took a look at the article. I agree with Nikkimaria. I'm not saying the article is bad. It's very good. Here are some errors (not big) I found:
Good luck.— Novice7 ( talk) 10:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The Nominator, TheAustinMan, has Resolved The Concerns Mentioned Above. Click "Show" Below For Details and Comments Regarding the Fixes
Resolved comments from TheAustinMan ( talk) 19:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
TheAustinMan ( talk) TheAustinMan ( talk) 19:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC) reply |
The Comments Below Are Not Part of the Resolved Comment Box
Comments (contd..)
The Comments Above Are Not Part of the Resolved Comment Box
Resolved comments from TheAustinMan ( talk) 15:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC) (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
|
Please read the FAC instructions and do not add template hidden headers to FAC noms. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:34, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 22:37, 18 March 2011 [1].
Frost Bank Tower ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because it meets all of the requirements. All statements included in the GA nomination and peer reviews have been fixed, according to those statements. If the article is close to FA, I can fix things as the nomination continues. By the way, I'm only 11, so please, not too harsh. TheAustinMan ( talk) 17:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Oppose - welcome to FAC! I don't mean to be discouraging, but I don't feel this article is yet at FA standards, although I'm open to changing my mind if you're able to resolve my concerns. If you need something below to be further explained, please let me know
Comments – Hello! Welcome to FAC! I took a look at the article. I agree with Nikkimaria. I'm not saying the article is bad. It's very good. Here are some errors (not big) I found:
Good luck.— Novice7 ( talk) 10:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The Nominator, TheAustinMan, has Resolved The Concerns Mentioned Above. Click "Show" Below For Details and Comments Regarding the Fixes
Resolved comments from TheAustinMan ( talk) 19:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
TheAustinMan ( talk) TheAustinMan ( talk) 19:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC) reply |
The Comments Below Are Not Part of the Resolved Comment Box
Comments (contd..)
The Comments Above Are Not Part of the Resolved Comment Box
Resolved comments from TheAustinMan ( talk) 15:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC) (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
|
Please read the FAC instructions and do not add template hidden headers to FAC noms. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:34, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply