The article seems well informative to me. Maybe its time to nominate it. But please feel free to oppose if you don't want to. --
ilyk2learn ilyk2learn 02:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose This is barely sourced and prose isn't that up to par…yet. O2 (
息 •
吹) 02:45, 02 November 2007 (GMT)
Sorry but I feel unable to support this nomination at the moment, The prose isnt up to scratch, and there are only 7 refs. It has potential. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article seems well informative to me. Maybe its time to nominate it. But please feel free to oppose if you don't want to. --
ilyk2learn ilyk2learn 02:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose This is barely sourced and prose isn't that up to par…yet. O2 (
息 •
吹) 02:45, 02 November 2007 (GMT)
Sorry but I feel unable to support this nomination at the moment, The prose isnt up to scratch, and there are only 7 refs. It has potential. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 06:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.